[Sports Architecture]
Sungshin Girls' High School Gymnasium
Architects : Poonyang SD Architects + AIM Architect
Location : Jungwon-gu, Seongnam-si, Gyeonggi-do, South Korea
Use : Gymnasium, Sports Center
Site Area : 38,092 ㎡
Building Area : 875 ㎡
Floor : 1F
Year : 2020
Step : Schematic design, Alternative plan process
[ Perspective View ]
 |
| ALT-1 ELEVATION |
 |
| ALT-1 BIRD EYE VIEW |
ALT-1 APPROACH ENTRANCE
ALT-2 ELEVATION
ALT-2 BIRD EYE VIEW
ALT-2 ENTRANCE APPROACH
[ Site plan ]
 |
| SITE PLAN FOR GYM |
[ Floor plan ]
 |
| 2ND FLOOR PLAN |
 |
| 1ST FLOOR PLAN |
[ Story for Building ]
다목적 강당, 체육관이 없는 학교는 여러 기능이 복합적인 공간을 계획하고자 하였다. 학교측에서 처음 제안했던 대지는 14미터 정도되는 옹벽위에 판넬의 가건물이 있는 곳으로 교사동에서 4~5미터 정도 아래에 있는 곳이었다. 대지의 첫 인상은 이러한 곳에 큰 규모의 건물이 입지할 수 있을까 하는 생각이었고, 옹벽이 건물을 지지할 수 있을지도 의문이었다. 운동장을 활용하는 안에 대하여는 너무 교사동과 거리가 멀고 오르내리는 위치로 인해 접근성이 떨어진다는 것이었다. 초기안은 최대한 옹벽을 건드리지 않고 밖으로 기둥을 지지하여 건물을 띄워서 배치하는 것이었다. 구조기술사와 수 차례 협업을 통하여 초기안을 만들었지만 옹벽에 대한 구체적인 구조 검토를 한 결과 구조적으로 견디기에는 무리가 있고 처음에 제시되었던 공사비에도 한참 부족하여 증축위치를 재검토하기로 하였다.
A school without a multipurpose auditorium or gym wanted to plan a space with multiple functions. The site first proposed by the school was a place with a temporary building made of panels on top of a retaining wall about 14 meters high, about 4 to 5 meters below the school building. The first impression of the site was whether a large-scale building could be located in such a place, and it was questionable whether the retaining wall could support the building. Regarding the proposal to use the playground, it was said that it was too far from the school building and accessibility was poor due to the location where it went up and down.
The initial plan was to place the building in a floating position by supporting the pillars outside without touching the retaining wall as much as possible. An initial plan was made through collaboration with a structural engineer several times, but as a result of detailed structural review of the retaining wall, it was difficult to withstand structurally and the construction cost that was initially proposed was far short of it, so it was decided to reexamine the location of the extension.
@HOONARCH